|
Do
not be put off by the terminology as it is a technical
term - not to be viewed pejoratively. The machine metaphor
that has dominated western thinking for generations
is now being challenged by the new Complexity Sciences.
They view living systems as adaptive organisms, capable
of collaborative and evolving action. To succeed in
an increasingly complex world, human beings and organisations
must embrace systemic thinking, interactive learning
and dynamic change.
The
term 'edge of chaos' was made popular by researchers
at the Santa Fe Institute in America to indicate a phase
in the evolution of a complex adaptive system. The concept
is conceived as a 'phase transition' in the way water
transforms into ice at 0°C. It's where there is
a balance between too much rigidity and too much laxity.
It represents a critical threshold where self-organization
and emergence are dominant processes. Organisations
and Coaches now support transformational change by facilitating
'edge of chaos' like conditions.
A
State of Tension
or Transition Phase
At the 'edge of chaos' we interact and adapt because
we are in a state of tension between stability (order)
and chaos (disorder). See Bounded Instability.
It is through human interaction that groups self-organise
to develop, discover and change direction. As a trainer
I would judge what I could do to create 'edge of chaos'
conditions to maximise their learning and create new
mental models.
The
tension between order and chaos can be seen as the result
of two constantly interacting dynamic processes. The
autopoeitic urge which resists change and focuse
inwards to retain and recreate an identity and the vital
urge of all living things to want to change, to
grow and explore the limits of its capability by focusing
outwards. They merge ina state of flow, a dance in which
the interactions produce unpredictable insights or patterns
of behaviour. It is often referred to as loose-tight
behaviour, shifting to survive in different environments.
Implications
for Coaching
The role of the Change Coach is to contain the anxiety
that being in the change zone generates, not to tell
the client what to do. What emerges therefore, co-evolves
through the richness of the coaching environment and
the rules governing the relationship. The coach's role
is to stimulate the client's internal feedback mechanisms.
If the coach tries to overcontrol the client the relationship
becomes unstable and the potential for change is much
reduced with existing behaviours continuing to be repeated.

The
challenge for change leaders and coaches is how to contain
the anxiety and unpredictability of operating at the
edge of chaos - not trying to control it. It is at 'the
edge' that interesting things happen, where learning
is maximised and it is possible to observe rules and
patterns in relationships.
Inside
the Change Zone
The dynamic nature of relationships when operating in
the change zone led Steve Trivett to create his own
Dynamic Change Model.
In
this model there is a set of principles or a vision
dimension that focuses energy from the top-down, imposing
a way of thinking and the rules governing the interactions
of agents in the sysetm. This creates tension as this
energy is often opposed by the self-organising energy
coming from the bottom-up as the agents in the system
develop their own culture
or spontaneous ways of working.

Another source of tension is generated by intelligent
agents in a human system. Their impact on the system
is variable depending on the inside-out energy that
reflects their individual capability
in response to the conditions that influence the amount
of outside-in energy or feedback from their environment.
Return
to top
|