|
The
work of Chilean biologists Humberto Maturana and Francesco
Varela underpin the new science thinking around autopoietic
systems.
They
observed how different species perceive their environment
depending on the complexity of their structures for
obtaining feedback, including making sense of it and
their ability to respond to it. All species are limited
by their biological structure, dertermining what they
are aware of and how they deal with or can adapt to
the daily issues of living in their environments.
When
looking at cognition they saw sensemaking as a way of
being in the world. For human beings, language seems
to be critical in enabling them to understand and create
reality from their observations and adaptations to the
world around them.
"Even
today, when an Aboriginal mother notices the first stirrings
of speech in her child, she lets it handle the 'things'
of that particular country: leaves, fruit, insects and
so forth. We give our children guns and computer games,
they give their children the land."
Bruce Chatwin The Songlines
Language
seems to be the structure human beings use to coordinate
and communicate action with each other. Cats do not
appear to be able to coordinate action
by making future arrangements to say ... meet behind
the garden shed at nine o'clock ?
As
a species we are continuously changing our structures,
including our body tissue and our language whilst still
retaining our identity. Biologists refer to this capacity
of structures to change as "plasticity".
Structural
Coupling emerges as a useful concept arising from the
work of Maturana and Varela. When we look at the relationship
between a human being and its environment, the emerging
conditions of the 'system in focus' becomes all important
in determining how people interact and communicate.
As
Fernando Flores points out in his 'Promise Cycle'
when relationships provide mutual satisfaction for both
entities in a shared environment, then important survival
and adaptive needs of each are met by the other. This
is the principle of 'coevolution'.
For
example, Don Beck's work on 'memtic coding' shows us
how the conditions prevailing in the environment can
have a profound effect on the way people think about
what's possible and decide on their priorities. The
more options they see open to them, the higher they
rise up the "dynamic spiral" of cultural sophistication.
This is also true of individuals - see 'Spiritual Coaching'.
In
Steve Trivett's Model of Dynamic Change the structural
coupling is affected by the energy drivers of change
as the environment shapes our ability to act and our
our actions shape our environment. This is when we observe
change happening or seek change something through our
own actions and look for the evidence. We live in language
so these are conversations in action.

Return
to top
|